AP HC: App. u/s 11(6) Can Only be Maintained if Parties Fail to Refer Dispute to Arbi. Even After Not || Del. HC: Father Held Guilty of Repeatedly Raping Minor Daughter for 2 Years, Acquittal Reversed || SC: Reconsideration Required of the Judgement That Brought Doctors Under Consumer Protection Act || SC: Person Purchasing Prop. Knowing About Appeal Pendency Can’t Claim Restit. as Bona Fide Purchaser || SC: Authorities Directed to Take Immediate Measures Regarding Municipal Solid Waste in Delhi || Del. HC: In-Mall Marketing Campaigns Also Advertisements, HUL Restrained from Comparing Products || Andhra Pradesh HC: Cannot Cancel Selection Process in Absence of Valid, Bonafide Reasons || SC: Cannot Make Advocates Liable for Deficiency of Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 || Cal HC: Not Operating in Totalitarian State, Govt. Can’t Exercise Blanket Power Over Every Instit. || Mad. HC: Can’t Deny Permission of Temple’s Festival on Grounds of Model Code of Conduct

Search Results for Tag : judicial time

News

Rajasthan HC: Bar Expected to Advise Parties Against Pursuing Lumber Litigation, Save Judicial Time(09.05.2022)

Rajasthan High Court has observed that if any litigation, with passage of time or due to prolonged life of the litigation has lost its merits; the par.....

Tags : Rajasthan High Court, lumber litigation, judicial time

Delhi HC: ‘Busybodies’ With Oblique Interest Can’t be Allowed to Waste Judiciary’s Time(24.05.2023)

Delhi High Court has held that while Court is cognizant of the liberal rules pertaining to public interest litigation, it must also ensure that busybo.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Busybodies, Oblique Interest, PIL, Judicial Time